Infosys Founders Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murthy Decline Participation in Caste Census Survey
In a surprising development, Infosys founders Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murthy have officially declined to participate in India’s ongoing caste-based census survey. In a self-declaration letter, the couple stated that they do not belong to any backward caste and, therefore, their information would be of no benefit to the government or to socially disadvantaged communities.
“We are economically, socially, and educationally advanced. Participating in this survey would serve no purpose for either the government or the underprivileged. Hence, we will not take part,” the couple reportedly wrote.
When census officials visited the Murthy residence in Jayanagar, Bangalore, they were met with this unexpected response. While government authorities hoped that the couple’s participation would set an example for others, the Murthys emphasized that joining a survey aimed at identifying disadvantaged groups is irrelevant for them.
Political Reactions and Controversy
The refusal has sparked debates across political lines. While the government intended the caste survey to identify underprivileged groups and allocate benefits accordingly, critics from BJP and RSS circles have raised concerns, claiming the survey could be used to divide communities.
Prominent BJP leaders, including Prahlad Joshi and Tejasvi Surya, have accused the survey of political motives, alleging it might favor Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi or target certain groups like RSS members. Such statements have fueled misinformation and heightened tensions around the census.
Despite this, Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has defended the government’s approach, emphasizing that the caste census is necessary to ensure equitable access to welfare schemes and that it does not aim to divide society. He stated that the survey is designed to prioritize assistance to the underprivileged and maintain social equality.
Public Perception and Social Implications
The debate around the caste census reflects deeper societal fears. Many politically influential communities have expressed apprehension about revealing their actual numbers, fearing potential implications on political representation and resource allocation. Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murthy’s decision not to participate, critics argue, underscores the skepticism and selective engagement prevalent among some educated and socially advanced groups.
The census, however, remains a critical tool for the government to implement welfare schemes effectively. According to officials, it will help identify genuinely disadvantaged groups and ensure resources reach the intended beneficiaries.
Conclusion
Narayana Murthy and Sudha Murthy’s refusal to join the caste survey highlights the ongoing controversies surrounding India’s caste-based data collection. While misinformation and political narratives dominate public discourse, the government maintains that the survey is aimed at promoting social equality and ensuring targeted welfare delivery.
No comments:
Post a Comment